Main newsSponsored byMost read
Discover

A radical game-changing plan

Humanity today finds itself in a profound paradox: our model of economic growth is running up against inexorable planetary limits, while the gap between the global North and South remains morally indefensible. The question is no longer whether we must transform ourselves, but whether we can reconcile global equality. (more…)

Smarter land use: How we can simultaneously protect the climate, biodiversity and boost the economy

National governments, multilateral institutions and international organisations around the world face a particularly difficult challenge: how to reconcile long-term environmental goals, such as protecting declining biodiversity and addressing urgent climate change, with equally important economic development goals. The prevailing view in society is that these two worlds are in direct conflict and that protecting nature automatically means economic losses. In the first ever analysis However, in a study of its kind, which included 146 countries around the world, an interdisciplinary research team led by experts from the University of Minnesota found something completely different. Their extensive study, published in the prestigious scientific journal Science, clearly demonstrates that Improved land use and management can bring huge, yet untapped benefits for both biodiversity and climate, as well as for economic development itself..

To reach these conclusions, the researchers integrated a vast amount of spatial biophysical and economic data with advanced optimization methods in a new model. The result of their work was the development of so-called „land sustainability efficiency frontiers“ for each of the 146 countries analyzed. This groundbreaking concept visualizes the maximum possible and feasible combinations of biodiversity protection, terrestrial climate change mitigation (focused on net carbon sequestration and methane emission reduction), and net economic value that comes from growing crops, raising livestock, and forestry production.

The country's efficiency frontier shows in practice how the highest possible economic value from agriculture and forestry can be achieved with a specifically set score for biodiversity protection and climate mitigation. The key finding of the study is that In most countries of the world, current land use generates results that are well below their efficiency limit.. This means that states are currently operating inefficiently and there is a gigantic scope for achieving both environmental and economic gains simultaneously.

If we applied this knowledge globally, the numbers would be fascinating. The sum of the results from all 146 countries shows the potential increase climate change mitigation by more than 200 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent, which would represent an increase of more than 20 %. At the same time, we could increase net economic value by more than $350 billion, or more than 80% of GDP. These massive benefits could be achieved without harming biodiversity and without the need to expand agricultural land.

These gains would result from two main approaches. The first is targeted land reallocation, which involves the selective restoration of forest areas in areas that are highly productive for this. The second step is intensification of crop cultivation, which has huge potential, especially in lower-income countries suffering from low agricultural yields.

Stephen Polasky, the study's lead author, highlights a key psychological dimension to the research. "We know we're facing both a climate crisis and a biodiversity crisis, but the argument against doing something about it is usually that it's going to cost too much," Polasky said. He says the analysis shows people what's realistically possible, and when they see the huge gains firsthand, making changes doesn't seem so daunting.

This view is also supported by Becky Chaplin-Kramer of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), who stated: „"This research proves that the alleged trade-off between nature conservation and growing economies is false."“. By creating detailed maps, international institutions and investors were given a precise plan to achieve common goals.

The practical impact of the findings is already beginning to be felt. The researchers are currently working with partners, including the World Bank, to develop country-specific analyses. The aim is to help international financial institutions better target resources so that countries can meet national economic goals while also meeting international climate and conservation commitments. The authors add that the model does not yet include many other ecosystem services and economic activities, which opens up room for further exploration of these fantastic synergies in the future. JRi&CO2AI

„"Landscape Carbon Removal Economy"

Based on the latest global scientific report The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2026 it can be stated that integrated modeIt is among the most promising types of new generation projects because it connects several priorities that are today considered key for climate policy, nature protection, and financing of carbon projects.

Strengths of the model

1. Solves multiple problems at once

The report emphasizes that the future of CDR (Carbon Dioxide Removal) will not only be about carbon storage, but also about projects that bring other social and environmental benefits (co-benefits), such as:

  • biodiversity protection,
  • adaptation to climate change,
  • fire prevention,
  • water retention,
  • regional development,
  • restoration of ecosystems.

This is exactly what your model fulfills.

2. Biochar is among the fastest growing CDR technologies

According to the report, today practically all technological revolutions consist mainly of:

  • biochar,
  • BECCS.

Biochar is identified as one of the most promising technologies for permanent CO₂ removal.

This means that the use of:

  • forest waste,
  • calamity wood,
  • biomass from fire prevention measures

for biochar production is fully in line with the current direction of the global CDR market.

3. Fire prevention is a recognized climate benefit

The report states that a significant part of projects funded in the field of CDR are also motivated by the objectives of:

  • wildfire management,
  • ecosystem restoration,
  • landscape resilience.

That is exactly the core of the model.


The greatest added value: disaster wood

This is where perhaps the strongest argument of the entire concept arises.

Calamitous wood:

  • after wind disasters,
  • after the lycorrhiza,
  • after snowdrifts,
  • after fires

represents a huge amount of biomass, which often:

  • remains in the forest,
  • gradually decomposes,
  • or will burn in other fires.

If this biomass is converted into biochar:

  1. the risk of fire will be reduced,
  2. the source of future emissions is removed,
  3. a permanent carbon sink is created,
  4. carbon credits will be generated,
  5. the soil and water regime will improve.

Such an approach is significantly more valuable than simply burning biomass for energy.


The strongest economic aspect

The report warns that future CDR projects will need to combine multiple sources of revenue, as carbon credits alone may not be sufficient.

The model allows to simultaneously generate:

  • Carbon Removal Credits (biochar),
  • Biodiversity Credits,
  • Fire Risk Reduction Payments,
  • Water Retention Payments,
  • Ecosystem Service Payments,
  • Environmental grants,
  • CRCF EU certification,
  • ESG investments.

This is a significantly more robust model than a classic biochar project.


Compliance with EU trends

The model is very well compatible with:

  • EU Nature Restoration Law,
  • EU Forest Strategy 2030,
  • CRCF,
  • Biodiversity Strategy 2030,
  • LULUCF,
  • Green Deal,
  • by the upcoming Nature Credits.

This is a concept that can be financed from multiple European sources at the same time.


Strategic assessment

The model can be classified into the following categories:

Integrated Landscape Carbon Removal System (ILCRS)

or

Climate Resilient Landscape Carbon Removal Model (CRLCR).

It is a hybrid between:

  • Nature-based Solutions,
  • Fire Resilience Programs,
  • Biochar Carbon Removal,
  • Ecosystem Restoration,
  • Ecosystem Finance.

From the perspective of the latest news State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2026 The concept of an integrated model is extremely promising because it addresses exactly those areas that experts identify as the future direction of CDR development:

✔ biochar carbon removal
✔ biodiversity protection
✔ forest fire prevention
✔ use of disaster wood
✔ soil regeneration
✔ water retention in the landscape
✔ climate adaptation of forests
✔ multi-source ecosystem financing.

Such a complex model does not yet have a single standardized designation, but it is among the closest to what could be called „"Landscape Carbon Removal Economy", which is a very likely direction for the development of climate projects in the EU after 2030. JRi&CO2AI

How climate change is changing our waters: An overview of key impacts on aquatic ecosystems

Climate change is not only affecting global temperatures, it is also fundamentally changing how our waters work. The global water cycle has been intensifying since at least the 1980s, bringing with it intensified cycles of precipitation and evaporation. These changes threaten not only the ecosystems themselves, but also the key services they provide us, such as (more…)

Discover more articles

LEGISLATION