EN 
SK 
The European Union, within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 committed to achieving climate neutrality by 2050 This ambitious goal requires not only drastic reductions in emissions greenhouse gases, but also the active removal of CO2 from the atmosphere through natural traps. Since forests cover almost 40 % of EU area, represent a key pillar in this strategy. Carbon credits are thus becoming a new business model that allows forest owners and farmers to monetize the environmental benefits of their work.
What is "carbon farming" and carbon credits?
Carbon farming (carbon agriculture and forestry) is defined as a set of land management practices lasting at least five years that lead to the capture and storage of atmospheric carbon in biogenic reservoirs (trees, soil) or to the reduction of soil emissions.
Carbon credit (or offset) is the basic unit of trade that represents one metric ton of CO2eq, which has either been prevented from escaping into the atmosphere or has been removed from it. In the European context, this model is evolving from purely voluntary initiatives to a highly regulated market with clear quality rules.
1. Key mechanisms for generating credits in forestry
European forestry can generate credits through several main activities:
A. Afforestation & Reforestation (ARR)
- Afforestation: Planting new forests on areas that have not been afforested for at least the last 50 years (e.g. abandoned agricultural land).
- Reforestation: Restoration of forest ecosystems in places where trees have been cut down or destroyed by disasters.
- Capacity: One hectare of forest can absorb on average 180 tons of CO2. In Mediterranean areas, when using fast-growing species, the sequestration rate can reach up to 35 Mg CO2/ha/year, while in the boreal zone these rates are lower.
B. Silvicultural Practices
These practices increase the carbon stock in existing forests beyond standard practice:
- Extension of the cooling period: Letting trees grow longer increases the amount of biomass in the forest landscape.
- Reducing mining intensity: It increases the proportion of older and larger trees, which hold more carbon.
- Continuous Cover Forestry (CCF): Clear-felling management ensures a continuous supply of carbon to the forest soil and reduces the risk of sudden release of CO2 during logging.
C. Restoration of wetlands and peatlands
Peatlands are huge carbon stores. Their drainage in the past has turned them into net emitters of emissions. Rewetting can dramatically reduce these emissions (by approximately 8 Mg CO2eq/ha/year) and over time transform the ecosystem back into a clean sink.
2. Certification frameworks: From EU to global standards
The credibility of credit depends on strict certification. In Europe, there is a multi-level system of certification schemes.
European Certification Framework (CRCF)
In 2024, the EU adopted a groundbreaking regulation on a carbon removal certification framework. Every project must meet criteria QUALITY:
- QUantification: Carbon removal must be precisely measurable and deliver clear climate benefits.
- Additionality: The activity must go beyond legal requirements and must not be economically viable without the sale of credits.
- Long-term storage: A distinction is made between temporary storage (min. 5 years) and permanent storage in geological repositories (hundreds of years).
- Sustainability: The project must not harm biodiversity or water cycles (the "do no significant harm" principle).
Major international standards (VCM)
These systems dominate the voluntary carbon market:
- Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) from Verra: The most widely used standard in the world. Their new methodology VM0047 integrates satellite data and dynamic reference lines for ARR projects.
- Gold Standard (GS): It places particular emphasis on social benefits and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
- ART-TREES: Standard designed for jurisdictional approaches (national or regional level of forest protection).
- Vivo Plan: It focuses on smaller, community projects.
National schemes in EU Member States
Many countries have developed their own successful protocols:
- France (Low Carbon Label – LBC): Methodology for afforestation and restoration of degraded stands.
- United Kingdom (Woodland Carbon Code – WCC): National standard for new forest stands with strict additionality testing.
- Germany (Wald-Klimastandard – WKS): It focuses on restoring forests after disasters to increase their climate resilience.
- Germany (MoorFutures): Specialized standard for peatland restoration.
- Denmark (Klimaskovfonden): Afforestation Support Fund.
3. Measurement and monitoring technologies
The modern carbon business model is built on accurate data. It no longer relies solely on manual sampling, but on data fusion.
- Allometric equations: Calculation of biomass based on trunk diameter (DBH) and tree height.
- LiDAR and Satellites: Laser scanning (LiDAR) allows for the determination of tree heights and biomass volume over large areas with millimetre accuracy. Programs such as Copernicus (Sentinel) provide free data to monitor changes in forest cover.
- AI and machine learning: Artificial intelligence processes satellite images to classify tree species and automatically detect forest loss or disease.
- Dynamic Baselines: Instead of static predictions, project progress is compared to nearby control areas in real time, dramatically increasing credit integrity.
4. Market trends and economic potential
The demand for carbon credits is driven by companies' efforts to achieve net zero emissions (Net-Zero).
- Market size: In 2021, the voluntary market was worth $2 billion, and is expected to reach $100 billion by 2030. 100 billion dollars.
- Prices: EU carbon allowances (ETS) reached record levels in early 2026 since August 2023.
- Investments: Corporate giants like Microsoft they are already contracting for millions of forest restoration credits worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
- ITMOs: Under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, countries can trade emission reductions among themselves, creating internationally transferable units.
5. Critical challenges to integrity and sustainability
So that forest credits are not perceived as greenwashing, they have to solve several problems:
- Non-permanence: The risk that carbon stored in the forest will be released during fires or bark beetle attacks. The solution is reserve funds (buffer pools), from which credits will be withdrawn in the event of damage to the project.
- Leakage: If a project prevents logging in one location, but demand for wood causes higher logging elsewhere, the net climate benefit is zero.
- Additionality: It must be proven that the forest would not have emerged through natural succession or would not have been protected even without financial incentives from credits.
- Biodiversity: The risk is planting monocultures of fast-growing species (e.g. eucalyptus), which quickly sequester carbon but destroy local ecosystems.
The future until 2050
Carbon credits represent an opportunity for European forestry to diversify its income while increasing the resilience of forests to climate change. The key to the success of this model is transparency and technology. The transition from static models to real-time monitoring and strict European CRCF legislation will ensure that credits truly reflect the carbon removed. By 2050, forests will not only serve as a source of wood material, but also as certified climate infrastructure, which will be essential for the survival of a zero-emissions economy. JRi&CO2AI
