{"id":38147,"date":"2025-11-07T07:12:41","date_gmt":"2025-11-07T06:12:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/?p=38147"},"modified":"2025-11-09T09:22:29","modified_gmt":"2025-11-09T08:22:29","slug":"cop30-belem-memorandum-of-bill-gates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/2025\/11\/07\/cop30-belem-memorandum-of-bill-gates\/","title":{"rendered":"COP30 Bel\u00e9m: memorandum of Bill Gates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Shortly before the start of the crucial COP30 negotiations in Brazil, tech billionaire and philanthropist Bill Gates dropped a \u201cnarrative grenade\u201d on the climate policy discourse by publishing a sweeping memorandum. This <!--more-->The document calls for a rethink of the way the climate crisis is understood and addressed, calling for a \u201cstrategic shift\u201d in current strategy. The response to the memorandum was immediate and mixed: while climate skeptics celebrated it, some climate scientists expressed anger and frustration.<\/p>\n<p>Despite social and traditional media being awash with false claims about Gates\u2019 alleged shift in views on climate change, he himself has in fact reaffirmed his support for ambitious decarbonization. Even US President Donald Trump misinterpreted the memo, claiming that Gates admitted he was \u201ctotally WRONG\u201d on climate change.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Passion and Reality: Three Gates Truths<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Gates does not admit to any such thing. On the contrary, he specifically writes in his document that \u201cclimate change will have serious consequences \u2013 especially for people in the poorest countries.\u201d He emphasizes that every tenth of a degree of warming that is avoided is \u201cimmensely beneficial.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At the heart of Gates&#039; memo is a request that negotiators consider &quot;three truths&quot;:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Climate change should be considered a &quot;serious problem&quot; but not the inevitable &quot;end of civilization&quot;<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Temperature targets, such as the Paris Agreement&#039;s focus on limiting warming to below 2\u00b0C, <strong>are not the best tools for measuring progress<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>The best way to protect humanity from climate change is <strong>efforts for global health and economic prosperity<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Central to Gates&#039; analysis is the belief that <strong>progress on climate change is already being made through growth and technological innovation<\/strong>He points out that technological innovations\u2014such as electric vehicles, battery storage, and renewable energy\u2014have already begun to reduce the carbon intensity of global economic activity. For this reason, Gates argues that <strong>&quot;worst-case scenarios&quot; are no longer likely<\/strong>It also calls for large-scale investments in global health and development, such as vaccines, and expresses continued support for the drive to achieve net zero carbon emissions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why the triumphant reactions of skeptics?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What resonated most strongly with climate skeptics was Gates\u2019 opening statement that climate change \u201cis not the end of the world.\u201d The memo begins by criticizing the \u201cdoomsday view,\u201d which claims that \u201ccatastrophic climate change will destroy civilization.\u201d Climate skeptics interpret this message in terms of black-and-white thinking (cognitive binaries) in which if climate change is not apocalyptic, then it is overblown and climate policy is unnecessary.<\/p>\n<p>The claim that climate change does not threaten the end of civilization is <strong>in close line with long-standing skeptical rhetoric<\/strong>that mainstream climate science relies on fear. Climate deniers seized on the news, with some media outlets adding to the confusion with misleading headlines, such as Gates saying \u201cclimate change isn\u2019t that bad.\u201d One of the biggest conspiracy channels on X even falsely claimed that Gates himself had admitted that climate change was a \u201clie.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Frustration among climate scientists<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Despite Gates&#039; unwavering support for decarbonization, some climate scientists are frustrated. They worry that Gates&#039; report <strong>places too much emphasis on exploratory and high-risk technologies<\/strong>Examples include small modular reactors, carbon capture and storage, and geoengineering.<\/p>\n<p>Climatologist Michael Mann has expressed concern that this focus on \u201ctechnological solutions to climate\u201d could lead down a \u201cdangerous path\u201d because they could <strong>distract from proven mitigation strategies<\/strong> and provide &quot;cover for continued fossil fuel burning in business as usual.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Other scientists found that the memorandum downplayed the severity of global warming observed to date, and in particular the warming expected by the end of this century, which could be as much as 2.9\u00b0C above pre-industrial levels. Scientist Daniel Swain expressed his \u201cdismay and deep frustration\u201d with the wording in the memorandum, precisely because it overlooked known harms and systemic risks. He also recalled the late Professor Stephen Schneider\u2019s remark that when it comes to global warming, \u201cthe end of the world\u201d and \u201cgood for humanity\u201d are the two lowest probable outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>The Gates memo doesn&#039;t change the science. Instead, it reveals how sensitive climate policy is to formulation, and that <strong>the same message can become ammunition for very different projects<\/strong>Climate scientists, meanwhile, continue to face the difficult task of communicating climate risks in a political environment ill-suited to nuance and complexity. <em><strong>JRi<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shortly before the start of the crucial COP30 negotiations in Brazil, tech billionaire and philanthropist Bill Gates dropped a \u201cnarrative grenade\u201d on the climate policy discourse by publishing a sweeping memorandum. This<\/p>","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cop28-cop29-cop30-cop31"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38147\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.co2news.sk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}